Skip to content

Download Computational Micromagnetism by Andreas Prohl PDF

By Andreas Prohl

Ferromagnetic fabrics are widespread as recording media.
Their magnetic styles are defined by means of the well-accepted version of Landau and Lifshitz. during the last years, varied ideas habe been built to take on the similar non-convex minimization challenge: direct minimization, convexification, and rest through the use of younger measures. Nonstationary results are thought of within the prolonged types of Landau, Lifshitz and Gilbert for (electrically undertaking) ferromagnets.
the target of this monograph is a numerical research of those versions. half I discusses convergence habit of other finite point schemes for fixing the desk bound challenge. half II bargains with numerical analyses of alternative penalization / projection thoughts in nonstationary micromagnetism; it closes with a bankruptcy on nematic liquid crystals to teach applicability of those new the way to additional applications.

Show description

Read Online or Download Computational Micromagnetism PDF

Similar nonfiction_10 books

Colour Atlas of First Pass Functional Imaging of the Heart

For a few years, clinicians have depended on cardiac marily be labeled into camps

Stellar Rotation: Proceedings of the IAU Colloquium held at the Ohio State University, Columbus, O., U.S.A., September 8–11, 1969

The overseas Astronomical Union Colloquium on Stellar Rotation used to be held on the Ohio kingdom college in Columbus, Ohio, U. S. A. from September eighth via eleven th, 1969. Forty-four scientists from Argentina, Belgium, Canada, England, Finland, East and West Germany, Italy, Israel, Japan, The Netherlands, and the U.S. attended and took part within the Colloquium.

Extra info for Computational Micromagnetism

Example text

29), we end up with 36 Chapter 1. Direct Minimization 3rd step: Here, we consider a general Lipschitz domain w C ]R2. 6 (a), and such that holds meas(w\w):s Ch/3, for o:s f3:S 1. 6 (a). 32) In the following, we refer to laminates {£i}~~-f3) of thickness O(h/3), and tips of length O(h/3). For W, we define a triangulation 1h :2 Th. 33) where p31 K is arbitrarily chosen to be p 31KnLi or p 31KnLj' i =I- j. 34) for a positive constant a 2 1. 34) is due to O(h-/3) laminates. For the following purposes, set u 4 = 6 (div (XwptJ) and u4 = 6(div (Xwp~)), taking Ph := Xwp~.

This leads to a quadratic-linear optimization problem which is rather large. h 2 of Sd-\ respectively. This result requires mesh-sizes h2 = o(h~/2) which makes computations rather costly. To avoid this drawback and reduce the number of unknowns, we make use of an adaptive strategy that (locally) singles out active atoms. Those are found by recently derived optimality conditions for (RP) in [83] to predict the support of a Young measure solution to (RP). 2. 3 for details of the algorithm as well as its analysis.

In particular, not only laminated structures develop in a computed magnetization Mh on general meshes T - which would create an energy contribution of magnitude O( Vii) - , but also branching structures close to 8w; proving this assertion is the goal of this section. We continue with the main result in this section. 1. 2 Let w C ]R2 be an uniaxial ferromagnet, and Tits quasiuniform triangulation. 1 1. The a priori analysis presented below reflects a 'worst-case' scenario. 2 (valid for general meshes).

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.51 of 5 – based on 50 votes